
Originally Posted by
HKim
I think the real issue here is terrorism more than anything.
The shooter clearly was influenced by ISIS and the organization's beliefs and goals. Whether or not he was formally associated remains to be seen, but a connection does exist.
It seems to me that the United States (and the rest of the world) needs to do a better job at locating potential threats and preventing them. There were warning signs prior to the shooting that were dismissed, but it might have been wise for the federal agencies to have continued to monitor the shooter for any unusual activity. Perhaps our current system isn't as up to the task as we hoped.
Of course, this would be less of a problem if we eliminated terrorist strongholds in the Middle East. These groups publicly advocate for these kinds of attacks and certainly influence people around the world. The attacks they carry out inspire others. For several years we've ignored these situations, not wanting to get involved, but I think that only exacerbates the issue. The world is much smaller now and what happens around the world will affect home. We should have invaded ISIS territory with a UN coalition and eliminated the problem. Yes there might be issues afterwards and a cost to be paid, but isn't that better than the loss of life we experience at home due to terrorism? Sometimes I think we forget why we have a military.
Bookmarks