PMD Stalkers General Chat Thread (The Secret Clubhouse!)

[Chakramaster]

Wait..."negative"?



I thought having a positive rapport was what made them spill more info. Unless you think it will make him accidentally spill something he didn't mean to?

Ah,in a way yes, in another no. Positive you can press certain things easier, but Negative. Things slip or are said to throw others out. Especially if you tend to press about "specifics." We tend to get a lot more information than we think.

Yeah, I don't want to let you down, Eric, but I think you've come to the wrong conclusion. They're not gonna get angry or anything like that at you-they're gonna not bother with you and 'politely' brush you off. They don't want to talk too much at all, which is worse. Distrust is rampant but unless you deliberately peeve them off, I doubt you'll get anywhere-and they may just walk off and leave, or consider those irritations equally unimportant as a stranger and 'not like them.' I'm getting a strong racist vibe from this town, no offense to anyone, and it seems to be a major point that Pokemon 'like them' make them open up compared to 'the others.' Case in point, Dassy clearly was far more guarded around you than around...

...Wow I am just the worst at names. Uh, the Altaria. Plus, she was friends with Daz. Double plus, how many Pokemon have you seen accuse other Pokemon that aren't of their type? Gloan was accused by Daz; Marche was accused by Mille; and such and so on.

I guess it's a 'better than nothing' sentiment, but I don't think they'll really care or take accusations seriously unless they feel its coming from a peer and not from someone who may not understand them at all. I always feel like I get weird looks when I'm not using the, uh, stealthy thing Mew gave us.

Sorry Tazz. I suggest you look back at all the interviews. Both Positive and Negative alike. Yeah we can get "certain info" from a Positive report, but Negative gives us important things anyway. EVERY Negative report has given us more information. No one has been "brushed off" or anything. In fact, one negative report about a certain "sheers" gave us a lot about that Pokémon.

In investingating. You can't ignore even the smallest detail. As with what happened just recently with Mille/Millie thing case example A. With that we got "something" being odd about her. My susprcions on her now are that she definitely is a Stalker now. My interview with her was enough to give away something after looking at all the evidence we have. I can't say it pointed directly at her, but I wanted evidence BEYOND a doubt before accusing anyone. We have to before jumping to conclusions. Open your thought process on this one. Positive is good, but even Negative shows us much NEEDED information. There just seems to be certain things they'll only talk about with certain groups. Negative and Positive. It's something to look st. Acts are a FACT now if we take the Mille/Millie thing seriously.

While time is of the essence, even one Stalker would help this process. Still it doesn't help knowing how the "real" Mille is so nice...