P.E.T.A. can't be all crazy right ?

[Tenacity]

The concept of vegetarianism and animal rights is one that has buzzed around and confused my mind for a couple of years now, and while I have been unable to come to a definitive answer about whether or not an animal's life is equal to a human's or whether or not we should eat meat, or even if it's healthy to not eat meat, I've decided that when I move out from my parent's house and have control over what food is brought into the house, I'll be eating only white meat every other day or so. By doing this I'll reduce the lives I take (until I can figure out whether lives should be taken at all) and be as healthy as I can see is possible.

It's also a fact that Vitamin B12, a very essential vitamin for humanity, is only found in animal sources and must be added artificially to other food sources if animal sources are not used. If not for these technological advances, humans would either have to eat animals or become sick. So nature clearly intended for humanity to eat animals - whether that's an appropriate argument for its morality is unclear. Were our human ancestors years before this technology immoral for eating animals? If no, why would that change in the present day? After all, life feeds on other life to work. Everything does it, it's one big cycle. When it comes to life, none are innocent for using other life in some way. Is only concious life valuable? There are just too many big questions to come to a conclusion about eating meat.

PETA's principles are not crazy. Their actions and targets, on the other hand, are questionable.