[PXFIRE] Welcome to your summer event: POKEMON CROSSFIRE!

[Morzone]

I would say just stick to one. My thing with this is it kind of deviates from why we changed the point system in the first place. Second, two scoring systems = a LOT more work for judges. That's hard because it already takes time to review and grade submissions.

And that's another thing we'd like to see as well. Judges need to justify awarded points with at least some feedback for every entry. Not "results: Submission A - 3 Points, B - 2 Points, C - 1 Points, have a nice day." There's got to be something that explains that and why the judge felt Submission A was better than B and so on. We're not asking for a huge narrative about every bitty detail, but at least a good paragraph of explanation is important.

I didn't mean 2 winners for each catagory, I meant over all.

For instance if in drawing Team A won first, Team B won second and team C won third, they would then in turn get one "gold" one "silver" and "bronze" point. Over the four weeks The team would count up how many gold/silver/bronze points they have, then combine them for an "medal victory" (I can't think of a better name) so that a team wins PXFIRE by being the team that placed most in the top 3 across the board.

On the other hand, say Team A only had one person participate in drawing, while Team B had 3 and Team C had four. For every person they would get one "team point" or "participation point" per week. Then at the end of the four weeks the teams would tally up their participation points and whichever had the most would be the "activity winner" for successfully getting the most people to do the most things. (encouraging people to try new things.

This wouldn't put any real extra stress on the judges at all since the "medal" points are already just the same method as picking top 3 winners
for each category, while participation is just counting how many people per team put in an entry that week.