Results 1 to 10 of 56

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    growing strong Pokemon Trainer Sarah's Avatar
    Site Editor

    Senior Administrator

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Route 1
    Posts
    10,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed-X View Post
    Yeah...I'm not a big fan of that specifically being the point system. It sounds like judges will be worrying more about just doing the correct math and making sure things add up depending on hypothetical values, such as number of participants...and that really takes away from the experience. If a judge has 100 points PER event or even per week just doesnt make any sense for those who find it more logical to use a rubric system

    If I'm understanding correctly based on Neo's post, I believe this kind of system in particular will do nothing other than confuse judges.

    Yeah...alr8ght. So I re read it. This would greatly interfere with any judges that want to use a rubric system, which especially in regards to art I feel is the most efficient way to do it so that the entrants actually learn what they did right and wrong, yes?

    It would make more sense to have a fixed number of points per person per challenge / week. 4 weeks? How about 20 points per person per week?
    I don't think 100 points is that hard to distribute. You can still use a rubric. The points you give out don't have to match the rubric points, but you could do it that way with a bit of maths if you wanted.

    A gets 15/20 on the rubric
    B gets 5/20
    C gets 15/20
    D gets 16/20
    E gets 16/20
    F gets 20/20
    G gets 12/20

    Max total of rubric = 7 x 20 = 140
    A got 15/140 = 10.7%. 10.7% of 100 = 10.7 points awarded.
    B got 5/140 = 3.5%. 3.5% of 100 = 3.5 points awarded.
    Etc.

    Each judge can decide how to awards their points. The simplest way is to award 1st, 2nd, 3rd a set amount of points and then divide the rest equally between the rest. Or any variation of that. It only has to be as complicated as the judge wants to make it.

    Your idea of each participant getting x/20 points for each event is pretty good too but I can see issues with teams dominating a single event and getting more points than teams participating in every event, as there is then no maximum points per event. The 100 points means teams have to join in most if not all events to win. Still worth discussing though. :)
    GCEA


  2. This post has been liked by:

    Soups 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •