Hmm...

At the same time though, if a judge is limited to only 100 points, what happens when you have a lot of participants? Imagine if we had 11 people put in art, and 4 of them were AMAZING, while rest weren't exactly terrible. You wouldn't be able to distribute points fairly because there simply wouldn't be enough of them. Is it possible that some categories might be able to give out more points than others?

Quote Originally Posted by Pokemon Trainer Sarah View Post
You're right but teams are already getting participation points with the current proposal. We don't want to push the participation thing too far where members are entering crappy no-effort entries just to get points. As part of the 100 points, if you enter something dumb for points you will only get 1 point haha. If its more like you said, it seems it will encourage no-effort entries without providing any advantage over the 100 point system (that I can tell?)
I didn't think of that.. hm...