Now that I've had a little time to think about these questions:

Do you think that traditional art must always be "practiced" before digital art? Does it no matter at all?
No, I don't believe that strictly traditional art must always be practiced before starting digital art; however, I do feel as if having a sufficient knowledge of drawing and sketching, be it in whatever form, is necessary. I started with simply drawing and still enjoy sketching for purposes of concept art and/or as a preliminary sketch, but I have never taken traditional mediums much further than that. I honestly do not like how you have to watch out for so many things when using traditional media. Digital media is much more convenient, can provide almost the same effect (ALMOST), and is all there right in front of you, no clutter necessary. However, don't get me wrong: I really admire people who can work with such complicated forms of traditional media.
Quote Originally Posted by Braixen
I have sketchbooks filled with drawings and concepts that have literately been viewed by no one. I find it hard to present art to other people to look at in person, although I consider myself a person of confidence there just seems to be a barrier there for me. I don't specifically like being complimented, and I often feel "naked" for lack of a better term, when presenting my art to someone in person.
I'm certainly glad I'm not the only one that feels this way! I feel as if art critiques are meant to be through some form of text / writing. Not only can you put more thought into and readjust things mentioned in a written critique before publishing. That and showing off any artwork in person just feels embarassing for similar reasons you stated!

Drawing came first, pixel art second, then regular ol' digital I started toying with.

Anyways, I honestly respect anyone who can make astonishing pieces of art, despite the medium they used.